Fictional scenario1 / 5
Buy to live / Area context
Start with the routine you would repeat.
Morning / Controlled illustration
The journey to the shop
Project A has a covered route to the daily shop. Project B has a more direct route across a road.
- For this brief
- A’s covered route is relevant to a repeated household routine. B remains an alternative if its crossing suits the household.
- Still to check
- Walk from each entrance to the shop at your usual time. Would everyone in the household use this route?
Afternoon / Controlled illustration
The garden you would use
Both projects show access to the shared garden. Recurring charges and access terms are not specified in the example.
- For this brief
- Unknown recurring charges prevent a complete ownership-cost comparison. Shared garden access needs documentary confirmation.
- Still to check
- Request the service-charge schedule and ownership access rights for the garden.
Evening / Controlled illustration
The outlook beyond the window
Project A faces the garden. Project B faces an open plot. No future-planning information is provided in the example.
- For this brief
- A’s garden outlook fits the example brief. B’s open plot needs planning context before its view influences a purchase.
- Still to check
- Inspect the actual units and ask for the planning context of the open plot.
Rent a home / Area context
Read the place as a routine for this stay.
Morning / Controlled illustration
The journey to the shop
Project A has a covered route to the daily shop. Project B has a more direct route across a road.
- For this brief
- B’s direct connection is useful only if the crossing works at the tenant’s usual time. A offers a different route to test.
- Still to check
- Try B’s crossing at the time you would leave home. If it fails your routine, walk A’s covered alternative.
Afternoon / Controlled illustration
The garden you would use
Both projects show access to the shared garden. Recurring charges and access terms are not specified in the example.
- For this brief
- An advertised garden is not yet confirmed tenant access. Missing lease inclusions prevent an all-in rental comparison.
- Still to check
- For each offer, what must the tenant pay and is garden access explicitly included?
Evening / Controlled illustration
The outlook beyond the window
Project A faces the garden. Project B faces an open plot. No future-planning information is provided in the example.
- For this brief
- Inspect the outlook of the unit being offered and ask whether planned work could affect the intended stay.
- Still to check
- Which exact unit is offered, and what information is available about nearby work during the stay?
Invest / Area context
Separate a resident story from an ownership case.
Morning / Controlled illustration
The journey to the shop
Project A has a covered route to the daily shop. Project B has a more direct route across a road.
- For this brief
- The routes can inform a tenant-fit hypothesis. They do not establish occupancy, rental demand or a rent premium.
- Still to check
- Which intended resident would choose each route, and what evidence supports that assumption?
Afternoon / Controlled illustration
The garden you would use
Both projects show access to the shared garden. Recurring charges and access terms are not specified in the example.
- For this brief
- Missing recurring costs and income evidence block a net ownership comparison, even if both projects advertise the garden.
- Still to check
- What are the purchase prices, recurring ownership costs and supported rental comparables for both projects?
Evening / Controlled illustration
The outlook beyond the window
Project A faces the garden. Project B faces an open plot. No future-planning information is provided in the example.
- For this brief
- B’s open plot is a due-diligence question for any view-related premium. The premium and future building are both unestablished here.
- Still to check
- What supports a view-related premium, and what does the planning record say about the open plot?



